5 errors across 8 spans. Total duration: 10.90s. Cost: $0.0522 across 3 LLM calls.
{
"workflow": "policy_grounding_review",
"environment": "production",
"issue_type": "refund",
"customer_tier": "self-serve",
"prompt_name": "refund-policy-check",
"prompt_version": 4,
"release_version": "2026.04.11",
"model_provider": "openai",
"model_name": "gpt-4o",
"ticket_id": "ticket_damaged_item_policy_checker_invented_a_denial_rule_session_damage_claim_policy",
"language": "en",
"user_id": "customer_refund",
"agent_profile_id": "policy-grounding-reviewer",
"agent_team": "Trust and Safety",
"agent_owner": "Policy quality",
"agent_mission": "Checks whether policy-heavy responses remain grounded in approved support rules.",
"story_label": "Damaged-item policy checker invented a denial rule",
"story_summary": "The policy-grounding path fabricated unsupported policy text instead of asking for clarification or escalating.",
"scenario_id": "scn_damaged_item_hallucination",
"customer_intent": "Customer claimed the replacement item arrived broken and asked whether photo evidence was enough for a refund.",
"expected_resolution": "Ask for clarification or escalate when the policy source is ambiguous, never invent denial language.",
"policy_result": "hallucinated_policy_denial",
"quality_score": 0.39,
"severity_tag": "critical",
"status_label": "Policy hallucination",
"replay_label": "Policy Grounding Reviewer · Damaged-item policy checker invented a denial rule",
"operator_notes": "Case: Damaged-item policy checker invented a denial rule\nIntent: Customer claimed the replacement item arrived broken and asked whether photo evidence was enough for a refund.\nExpected resolution: Ask for clarification or escalate when the policy source is ambiguous, never invent denial language.\nObserved policy result: hallucinated_policy_denial\nStory summary: The policy-grounding path fabricated unsupported policy text instead of asking for clarification or escalating.\nAgent role: Policy Grounding Reviewer\nOwner team: Trust and Safety"
}